342 replies to this topic

[scotchmist]

Laurie, on 16 February 2012 - 01:41 PM, said:

Couldn't agree more - very well said.

dont give a fuck! get rid of the charlatans. if that means the team as well so be it. where is the tax payers money. take back the trophies, titles and the european money used to buy the trophies at the taxpayers expence. murray and whyte are cheatin bastards and so are all so called supporters if they think it is alright to cheat the hmrc.

[SheenyBob]

scotchmist, on 18 February 2012 - 10:20 PM, said:

dont give a fuck! get rid of the charlatans. if that means the team as well so be it. where is the tax payers money. take back the trophies, titles and the european money used to buy the trophies at the taxpayers expence. murray and whyte are cheatin bastards and so are all so called supporters if they think it is alright to cheat the hmrc.

Drinking on an empty heid tonight again i see

[Barbarossa]

not sure I certainly won't miss the bigotry ......I might miss the buzz of the games against them ...but hey I'm willing to take the chance & see them gone.

[hayza]

The SPL would be worse without the dodgers but if Newco comes to pass SFL Div 3 if they will have you if not couldnt give a fuck where they go.

[DEXTER]

Can someone fill me in please. Is this the same Hayza that has been floating around for ages or is it someone else. Just so i know. Thanks.

[sheeptastic]

DEXTER, on 19 February 2012 - 12:03 AM, said:

Can someone fill me in please. Is this the same Hayza that has been floating around for ages or is it someone else. Just so i know. Thanks.

one in the same, back after a break

[SheenyBob]

sheeptastic, on 19 February 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:

one in the same, back after a break

Jungle Joe the Businessman of the year 2010 took Hayza, Cal & Hector away on a sabbatical

[Laurie]

Barbarossa, on 18 February 2012 - 11:17 PM, said:

not sure I certainly won't miss the bigotry ......I might miss the buzz of the games against them ...but hey I'm willing to take the chance & see them gone.

Do you think if there wasn't Rangers then the sectarian element of Celtic would possibly subside, at least to an extent? Genuine question.

If there is no opposing 'side' to wind-up/rile then would it maybe change things? I know that my own club has its share of bigots, but it's not on the same scale.

[black dog]

sheeptastic, on 19 February 2012 - 12:43 AM, said:

one in the same, back after a break

Aye, the same one that returned promising one and all not to revert to his previous agenda.....empty promises indeed.............

[jimmy gomis]

Laurie, on 16 February 2012 - 10:44 AM, said:

I'd disagree with that. At the most the gap has stayed the same.

I can still remember for years that I'd pretty much expect a 4 or 5 goal humping against the Old Firm, and rarely ever saw Hearts, or anyone, take points off of them.

Last week's hammering at the hands of Celtic was bad, but it was a shock to most people - and it wasn't ACTUALLY a very one sided game.

In the days of O'Neill we'd quite regularly be 3 or 4 goals down at half time to Celtic. These days we generally beat them at least once a season, and go to Ibrox and quite often get points.

The gap is still big, but both sides of the Old Firm quite regularly get a close match against other sides - in comparison to regular scores of 4,5,6 - even 8, goals to the good.

Totally agree. I had this very arguement with someone recently.

[jimmy gomis]

Can I also add to this thread that I think McCoist has gotten off a bit scot free over the past couple of weeks. All the talk has been about the financial side of things and how everyone feels sorry for him and the players - erm how does that have anything to do with their performances or tactics against United and Killie? Genuine question. He's actually lucky that the other stuff has directed the flak away from him and his players. Regardless of losing Jelavic, Rangers should still have enough about them to not lose two home games on the bounce.

[hoopz]

jimmy gomis, on 19 February 2012 - 12:37 PM, said:

Can I also add to this thread that I think McCoist has gotten off a bit scot free over the past couple of weeks. All the talk has been about the financial side of things and how everyone feels sorry for him and the players - erm how does that have anything to do with their performances or tactics against United and Killie? Genuine question. He's actually lucky that the other stuff has directed the flak away from him and his players. Regardless of losing Jelavic, Rangers should still have enough about them to not lose two home games on the bounce.

agreed, its a good point you make, he got away witht the maribor/malmo results and falkirk, but people gave him the benifit of the doubt as he was new, so fair enough, but even now with the club in this crisis, the players should have came out fighting for a win for the full house that turned up.

[Camshy]

jimmy gomis, on 19 February 2012 - 12:37 PM, said:

Can I also add to this thread that I think McCoist has gotten off a bit scot free over the past couple of weeks. All the talk has been about the financial side of things and how everyone feels sorry for him and the players - erm how does that have anything to do with their performances or tactics against United and Killie? Genuine question. He's actually lucky that the other stuff has directed the flak away from him and his players. Regardless of losing Jelavic, Rangers should still have enough about them to not lose two home games on the bounce.

I have to say i think you are being a little unfair on your own team Jimmy, i watched the game that day and Utd were excellent and whatever tactic Ally would have had i doubt we would have been able to cope such was the power and pace of your team that day. As for the Killie game well i have not seen any of the match and i guess it would be to easy to blame it on the events of last week ???

[had29]

have been reading on here and various other news and media outlets, and It never ceases to amaze me the opportunities the opposite fans will take to have a go at each other. In terms of Celtic being able to survive without Rangers it is a question that no one knows the answer to. The football scene has not known what it is like to have only 1 old firm club in existence since 1888. I know that bigotry has a long memory, but even I don't think any fans alive today were about that long ago.

Companies exist and operate within a Market. Like it or not, Rangers are a part of that market. If they cease to exist, the rest of the market stakeholders will inevitably have to cut their cloth accordingly.

let them both go to the great football league in the sky. If the absence of an old form game prevents 1 assault or 1 incidence of domestic violence, then good riddance to them both.

Edited by had29, 19 February 2012 - 05:43 PM.

[sheeptastic]

had29, on 19 February 2012 - 05:42 PM, said:

have been reading on here and various other news and media outlets, and It never ceases to amaze me the opportunities the opposite fans will take to have a go at each other. In terms of Celtic being able to survive without Rangers it is a question that no one knows the answer to. The football scene has not known what it is like to have only 1 old firm club in existence since 1888. I know that bigotry has a long memory, but even I don't think any fans alive today were about that long ago.

Companies exist and operate within a Market. Like it or not, Rangers are a part of that market. If they cease to exist, the rest of the market stakeholders will inevitably have to cut their cloth accordingly.

let them both go to the great football league in the sky. If the absence of an old form game prevents 1 assault or 1 incidence of domestic violence, then good riddance to them both.

good post there, and welcome to the forum

[black dog]

Quote

Had29 said:

but even I don't think any fans alive today were about that long ago.

Do Not insult me mate....I wiz actively supporting the Gers prior to the Ibrox disaster and luckily survived...cntd going to the games and fortunately am able to come on here today and say that yer post is nonsense!!!

[black dog]

sheeptastic, on 19 February 2012 - 05:48 PM, said:

good post there, and welcome to the forum

You think that that was a good post considering the part that I highlighted?

[sheeptastic]

black dog, on 19 February 2012 - 05:48 PM, said:

Do Not insult me mate....I wiz actively supporting the Gers prior to the Ibrox disaster and luckily survived...cntd going to the games and fortunately am able to come on here today and say that yer post is nonsense!!!

aye dog is an aaaaaaauld yin

[had29]

Sheeptastic,. thank you for the warm welcome

The Dog's Bollocks. Eh?? Who insulted you? You might disagree with me, but my post was not nonsense. It made perfect sense (at least to me when I re-read it). You just didn't agree with it.

[sheeptastic]

black dog, on 19 February 2012 - 05:49 PM, said:

You think that that was a good post considering the part that I highlighted?

I must be being thick, what is the issue there?